POST OP RESPIRATORY INFECTION
  1.  An overview of the patient
  • Outline of the patient history and basic Pathophysiology

John Grant has been diagnosed with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and is 63 years of age. Though he recovered from the operation he has a history of suffering from angina, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, and type 2 diabetes. He used to work in his café earlier, but now it is managed by his elder daughter, and his household work is managed by him but help is offered by his son and daughter-in-law (Bae, et al., 2014).

Pathophysiology can be defined as the term which deals with the etiology, development, and elimination of pathological processes. In addition to this, the processes underlying these basic mechanisms are contributed by this, and model systems and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged strongly.

  • Discussion of medical history and family

John Grant was being medicated with Endone 5 mg prn under the GP prescription but because of these bad conditions of pain he was suggested for the right knee replacement and the lan was made for the left knee also. He completely recovered from the first operation and had a history of some other complexities of health (Bae, et al., 2014). His social environment was absolutely fine as he was taken care of y his elder daughter who helped in taking care of the café. His son and daughter-in-law are helping him with the household work and cooking. His family consists of an elder daughter who is with the workload in the café and a son and daughter-in-law who are in support of John Grant (Breimaier, Halfens & Lohrmann, 2015).

  • Identify and discuss risk factors for respiratory infection

It is not possible to get rid of viruses and bacteria, yet there are certain factors of risks such as social, environmental, and economic factors which are involved in developing acute respiratory infection. The immune systems of adults in old age and children are highly prone to viruses (Carlson, 2014). It can be contacted through virus carriers. The virus can be spread from the environment if sanitary conditions, neatness, and tidiness are not maintained. Individuals with lung problems and heart disease are likely to be affected by a respiratory infection. The risk is also caused if the immune system is weakened by any other diseases.

  • Literature

In the literature published by Carlson, the study found that socioeconomic and environmental factors are associated with respiratory infections. The results from this study are pointing toward the potential areas of involvement in which campaigns of the community regarding respiratory infection symptoms are included (Carlson, 2014). Many strategies have been initiated for reducing poverty in which modern stove distribution and rural electrification are included which might be useful in reducing the dirty way of cooking fuel, enhancing living conditions, and reducing the barriers to health care in the future.

  1. Comprehensive assessment
  • Areas of systematic assessment

The critical care patient has to be conducted with the principles of the bedside assessment according to the ppatient’scondition in the current report. This type of assessment is considered to be an important skill of nursing which will integrate the history knowledge of taking and the physical assessment of the patient (Drageset, et al., 2015). In addition to this, the specific screening and the assessment tools for the comprehensive mental health assessment are included.

  • Risk assessments

In the current situation of the patient, the risk assessment can be considered to be a careful tool for making decisions for comparing the options and the study that is needed for reducing the risk measures.  This is chosen because the patient is suffering from knee pain and the decision of replacing the knees was appropriate if it was not taken at the right time in the right way he would have suffered a lot (Drageset, et al., 2015). The other risk assessment is patient safety it is because he has a strong history of other health problems so for his safety he has been treated at the right time where the risk of consequences and the associated uncertainties are avoided.

  • Compare and contrast differing views

John Grant after getting treated for his knee pain problem, he has joined the ward for further care of his ill health. The patient who has been hospitalized has to be monitored regularly for their betterment. Falls are considered to be a serious problem for this patient, reducing his quality of life and duration. Some of the ffalltools for risk assessment were developed and tested while others have serious validity discrepancies.

  • Literature

In assessing the risk of falls the STRATIFY scale is the best tool for patients will ill health. With the help of this scale, it was found that the DOR was high when compared with that of MFS and HFRM II. However, the behavior of these instruments will be varying considerably based on the environment and the population. Hence, before implementation, their operations are to be tested (Drageset, et al., 2015). For reassessing the instruments with regards to the ill patients and the actual compliance of the personnel health care with the procedures that are related to the safety of the patient the effect has to be investigated.

  • Specific strategies

Healthcare needs: For meeting the needs of the client, in this case, the things that benefit his health such as prevention of the disease, diagnosis in the early stage, appropriate treatment, terminal care, etc. are to be provided. Most nurses believe that the need of the patient in terms of healthcare services, but from the view of the patient, it is the things that will make them healthier (Simmons, et al., 2015).

Health needs: The health needs will be incorporating the broad range of determinants of health in terms of social and environmental factors such as employment, diet, housing, etc. In the population, the health needs will be changing constantly and most of them will not be agreeable to the medical intervention (Toles, et al., 2014).

  • Plan to prevent a postoperative respiratory infection

The evidence-based practices are to be organized by the critical care nurse for preventing post-operative respiratory infection. The risk factors of the patient have to be assessed and they are to be closely monitored which is part of the prevention. The strategies for preventing post-operative respiratory infection in clients should be in the form of care bundles which have to be structured for improving the outcomes of the patient (Hirst & Cole, 2014). The patient must be educated regarding the following five key interventions which have been proven to decrease the infection in the client. The following interventions are included in the care bundle for effectiveness:

  • Exercises consisting of deep breathing
  • Coughing
  • Positioning
  • Ambulation and organization early
  • Pain management optimally
  • Compare and contrast views

TPost-operative respiratory infection is known to be influenced by a varied number of risk factors that have become very relevant in patients who are mostly exposed to the hospital-borne environment. Most of the risk factors can be modified and bringing awareness about these factors, along with attempts of limiting their occurrence will help reduce the HAP rates (Carlson, 2014). These risk factors can be categorized into 3 mechanisms such as the aerodigestive tract will be colonized with the pathogenic bacteria, taking in the secretions that are contaminated, and host defenses being impaired because of the critical illness.

  • Literature

TPost-operative respiratory infections in patients are suspected usually when the client is developing progressive pulmonary infiltrate along with fever, leucocytes, and tracheobronchial secretions (Carlson, 2014). However, these criteria of a clinical trial are considered to be non-specific for diagnosing the post-operative respiratory infection in the client and hence numerous things which have noninfectious ween causing the fever and the infiltrates of pulmonary which are to be considered.

  1. Evaluation of care
  • Interpersonal collaboration

Interpersonal collaboration in health care is found to show improvements in the outcomes of the patient. If the patient experiences the relocation of the place, then the social and environmental conditions will be helping in enhancing the ill health conditions of the patients (Carlson, 2014). This will help optimize the dosages of medication by providing toral support at the care center by nurses, doctors, co-patients, etc. The providers of health care are also benefitted in when extra work is reduced and job satisfaction will be increased.

  • Strategies to evaluate plans of care

The evaluation is the final step that is used for determining the expected outcomes regarding the plan of care by the nurses. It is evaluated by testing whether the well-being of the patient is improved or not. It is evaluated whether the caregiving by the nurse is effective or not. The outcomes that are expected are considered to be the standards against which the goals of the nurses are judged to be met or not and is the care is successful (Breimaier, Halfens & Lohrmann, 2015). The plan of care is evaluated by estimating providing health care in a timely, competent, and cost-effective manner. The process of evaluation will be determining the effectiveness of the care given, making any necessary modifications, and consistently making sure of favorable outcomes for the clients (Breimaier, Halfens & Lohrmann, 2015).

References

Bae, S. H., Kelly, M., Brewer, C. S., & Spencer, A. (2014). Analysis of nurse staffing and patient outcomes using comprehensive nurse staffing characteristics in acute care nursing units. Journal of nursing care quality, 29(4), 318-326.

Boockvar, K., Signor, D., Ramaswamy, R., & Hung, W. (2013). Delirium during acute illness in nursing home residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association14(9), 656-660.

Braden, H. J., Ko, M., Bohmfalk, M., Hortick, K., & Hasson, S. (2013). Gait Speed Improves During Physical Therapy in General Acute Care, Skilled Nursing, and Inpatient Rehabilitation‐a Pilot Study. The Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 4(1), 20-25.

Breimaier, H. E., Halfens, R. J., & Lohrmann, C. (2015). Effectiveness of multifaceted and tailored strategies to implement a fall-prevention guideline into acute care nursing practice: a before-and-after, mixed-method study using a participatory action research approach. BMC nursing14(1), 18.

Carlson, B. (2014). Nursing 751: Advanced Practice Nursing: Acute/Critical Care Theory and Technology.

Coffey, A., Tyrrell, M., Buckley, M., Manning, E., Browne, V., Barrett, A., & Timmons, S. (2014). A multicentre survey of acute hospital nursing staff training in dementia care. Clinical Nursing Studies, 2(4), p39.

Drageset, J., Eide, G. E., Harrington, C., & Ranhoff, A. H. (2015). Acute hospital admission for nursing home residents without cognitive impairment with a diagnosis of cancer. European Journal of cancer care, 24(2), 147-154.

Hirst, S., & Cole, M. (2014). The Process of Gerontological Competence in the Delivery of Acute Nursing Care. Indian Journal of Gerontology28(4), 456-468.

Parker, M. S. (2014). Interprofessional Collaborative Approaches to Reduce Risk, Decrease Financial Loss, and Improve Patient Care Outcomes in Acute Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Pizzingrilli, B., & Christensen, D. (2014). Staff perceptions of pod nursing on an acute mental health unit. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4(12), 88.

Simmons, S. F., Schnelle, J. F., Saraf, A. A., Coelho, C. S., Jacobsen, J. M. L., Kripalani, S., … & Vasilevskis, E. E. (2015). Pain and satisfaction with pain management among older patients during the transition from acute to skilled nursing care. The Gerontologist, gnv058.

Toles, M., Anderson, R. A., Massing, M., Naylor, M. D., Jackson, E., Peacock‐Hinton, S., & Colón‐Emeric, C. (2014). Restarting the cycle: incidence and predictors of first acute care use after nursing home discharge. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(1), 79-85.